On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 8:40 AM, Tomas Vondra
<tomas.von...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:

>> ===
>> @@ -2697,6 +2697,7 @@ check_partial_indexes(PlannerInfo *root, RelOptInfo
>> *rel)
>>                         continue;                       /* don't repeat
>> work if already proven OK */
>>                 have_partial = true;
>> +               break;
>>         }
>>         if (!have_partial)
>>                 return;
>> ===
>> The initialization has been moved to set_rel_size so the break
>> can be restored.
> FWIW the break was restored in the v9 by me.

Yeah, I kept that in v10, so the three of us seem to be on the same
page there.

>> FWIW, as mentioned upthread, I added the following condition to
>> decline ripping index predicates from base restrictinfo without
>> understanding the reason to do so.
> Ummmm, I'm a bit confused. Which condition?

Yeah, any additional discussion about areas which anyone sees as
open or still needing attention might allow me to get enough
traction to wrap this; I'm having trouble seeing what the pending
issues are where both Tom and Kyotaro-san seemed to be unsatisfied.

Kevin Grittner
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to