On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 10:19 AM, Alexander Ostrow <a...@epcylon.com> wrote:

> Hello,
> I thought it would be cool to have conditional check syntax, which gets
> converted to simple check constraint syntax.
> Here’s a gist:
> https://gist.github.com/aj0strow/5a07f2ddcad324c4dac2c4095c821999
> It’s just sugar, but i think it would make check constraints easier to
> read, and easier to write without backwards boolean logic.

For future reference please make every effort to make emails to the list
self-contained - which has the added benefit of avoid link expiration in
the future.

As to the recommendation at hand - I don't see significant value in
implementing non-SQL Standard syntax in this area.

David J.

Reply via email to