2016-04-01 18:57 GMT+02:00 David G. Johnston <david.g.johns...@gmail.com>:
> On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 10:19 AM, Alexander Ostrow <a...@epcylon.com> wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> I thought it would be cool to have conditional check syntax, which gets >> converted to simple check constraint syntax. >> >> Here’s a gist: >> >> https://gist.github.com/aj0strow/5a07f2ddcad324c4dac2c4095c821999 >> >> It’s just sugar, but i think it would make check constraints easier to >> read, and easier to write without backwards boolean logic. >> > > For future reference please make every effort to make emails to the list > self-contained - which has the added benefit of avoid link expiration in > the future. > > As to the recommendation at hand - I don't see significant value in > implementing non-SQL Standard syntax in this area. > +1 This formula should be known to all developers Regards Pavel > David J. > > >
