On April 1, 2016 10:25:51 PM GMT+02:00, Jesper Pedersen <jesper.peder...@redhat.com> wrote: >Hi, > >On 03/31/2016 06:21 PM, Andres Freund wrote: >> On March 31, 2016 11:13:46 PM GMT+02:00, Jesper Pedersen ><jesper.peder...@redhat.com> wrote: >> >>> I can do a USE_CONTENT_LOCK run on 0003 if it is something for 9.6. >> >> Yes please. I think the lock variant is realistic, the lockless did >isn't. >> > >I have done a run with -M prepared on unlogged running 10min per data >point, up to 300 connections. Using data + wal on HDD. > >I'm not seeing a difference between with and without USE_CONTENT_LOCK >-- >all points are within +/- 0.5%. > >Let me know if there are other tests I can perform
How do either compare to just 0002 applied? Thanks! -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
