On 04/01/2016 04:39 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
On April 1, 2016 10:25:51 PM GMT+02:00, Jesper Pedersen
<jesper.peder...@redhat.com> wrote:
Hi,
On 03/31/2016 06:21 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
On March 31, 2016 11:13:46 PM GMT+02:00, Jesper Pedersen
<jesper.peder...@redhat.com> wrote:
I can do a USE_CONTENT_LOCK run on 0003 if it is something for 9.6.
Yes please. I think the lock variant is realistic, the lockless did
isn't.
I have done a run with -M prepared on unlogged running 10min per data
point, up to 300 connections. Using data + wal on HDD.
I'm not seeing a difference between with and without USE_CONTENT_LOCK
--
all points are within +/- 0.5%.
Let me know if there are other tests I can perform
How do either compare to just 0002 applied?
0001 + 0002 compared to 0001 + 0002 + 0003 (either way) were pretty much
the same +/- 0.5% on the HDD run.
Best regards,
Jesper
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
