Stephen Frost <sfr...@snowman.net> writes:
> * Noah Misch (n...@leadboat.com) wrote:
>> I see some advantages of writing "TokenUser", as you propose. However, our
>> error style guide says "Avoid mentioning called function names, either;
>> instead say what the code was trying to do." Mentioning an enumerator name
>> is
>> morally similar to mentioning a function name.
> That's a fair point, but it doesn't mean we should use a different
> spelling for the enumerator name to avoid that piece of the policy. I
> certianly don't see "token user" as saying "what the code was trying to
> do" in this case.
FWIW, "token user" conveys entirely inappropriate, politically incorrect
connotations to me ;-). I don't have any great suggestions on what to use
instead, but I share Stephen's unhappiness with the wording as-committed.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
