David Steele <da...@pgmasters.net> writes:
> On 3/29/16 12:58 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> ... Basically,
>> my point is that LOG_ONLY achieves 95% of the benefit for probably
>> 0.01% of the work.
> Attached is a patch that re-purposes COMMERROR as LOG_SERVER_ONLY. I
> went ahead and replaced all instances of COMMERROR with LOG_SERVER_ONLY.
Uh, what? COMMERROR is a distinct concept in my opinion. It might happen
to share the same implementation today, but that doesn't make it the
same thing.
I had in mind a patch that simply added LOG_SERVER_ONLY as another define
and did whatever seemed appropriate documentation-wise. I see no reason
to touch the places that are currently dealing with client communication
failures.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
