David Steele <da...@pgmasters.net> writes: > On 3/29/16 12:58 PM, Tom Lane wrote: >> ... Basically, >> my point is that LOG_ONLY achieves 95% of the benefit for probably >> 0.01% of the work.
> Attached is a patch that re-purposes COMMERROR as LOG_SERVER_ONLY. I > went ahead and replaced all instances of COMMERROR with LOG_SERVER_ONLY. Uh, what? COMMERROR is a distinct concept in my opinion. It might happen to share the same implementation today, but that doesn't make it the same thing. I had in mind a patch that simply added LOG_SERVER_ONLY as another define and did whatever seemed appropriate documentation-wise. I see no reason to touch the places that are currently dealing with client communication failures. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers