On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 3:34 PM, David Rowley
<david.row...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> I wrote 0002 - 0004, these were reviewed by Tomas.
> 0005 is Haribabu's patch: Reviewed by Tomas and I.
I think it might be a good idea if these patches made less use of
bytea and exposed the numeric transition values as, say, a 2-element
array of numeric. Maybe this doesn't really matter, but it's not
impossible that these values could be exposed somewhere, and a numeric
is an awful lot more user-friendly than an essentially opaque bytea.
One of the things I eventually want to figure out how to do with this
is distributed aggregation across multiple shards, and I think it
might be better to have the value being sent over the wire be
something like {26.6,435.12} rather than \x1234...
Thoughts?
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
