Thank you, pushed with Petr's notice Dmitry Dolgov wrote:
On 6 April 2016 at 03:29, Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net <mailto:and...@dunslane.net>> wrote: Yeah, keeping it but rejecting update of an existing key is my preference too. cheers andrew Yes, it sounds quite reasonable. Here is a new version of patch (it will throw an error for an existing key). Is it better now?
-- Teodor Sigaev E-mail: teo...@sigaev.ru WWW: http://www.sigaev.ru/ -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers