On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 9:01 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Peter Geoghegan <p...@heroku.com> writes: >> Will this make it into the next point release? I was rather hoping it would. > > I dunno. I certainly haven't reviewed it carefully enough to commit it. > Perhaps Peter has, but time grows short ...
I have looked at this patch. Do we need to worry as well about SSL_shutdown in disconnection code path? I believe that we don't care much if an error happens at this point but we surely should consume any error generated because the SSL context is kept after destroy_ssl_system and another connection attempt may be done using the same SSL context, no? -- Michael -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
