On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 10:23 AM, Peter Eisentraut <pete...@gmx.net> wrote: > On 04/07/2016 03:47 AM, Michael Paquier wrote: >> >> I have looked at this patch. Do we need to worry as well about >> SSL_shutdown in disconnection code path? I believe that we don't care >> much if an error happens at this point but we surely should consume >> any error generated because the SSL context is kept after >> destroy_ssl_system and another connection attempt may be done using >> the same SSL context, no? > > > But we are the only user of our SSL context, and we clear the error before > every call we make (with this patch). The clean up afterwards is only if > someone else is also using SSL in the same process, and they won't use our > SSL context.
Argh, yes. Because SSL_free() is directly used. I should read those docs more carefully. -- Michael -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers