On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 6:48 AM, Pierre-Emmanuel André <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 06:30:35PM +1300, Thomas Munro wrote: >> On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 12:49 PM, Marisa Emerson <[email protected]> wrote: >> > On 18/03/16 03:57, Thomas Munro wrote: >> >> >> >> You used one name in the docs and another in the code: >> >> >> >> + BSD Authentication on PostgreSQL uses the >> >> <literal>auth-postgres</literal> >> >> + login type and authenticates with the <literal>postgres</literal> >> >> login >> >> >> >> + retval = auth_userokay(user, NULL, "auth-postgresql", passwd); >> > >> > >> > Woops, fix attached. >> >> Thanks! >> >> I'm CCng Pierre-Emmanuel André, maintainer of the OpenBSD postgresql >> port/package, just in case he has any feedback. >> >> Pierre-Emmanuel, here's the full thread in case you missed it: >> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/[email protected] > > Sorry for the late answer. > I've tested the patch on @amd64 with the latest PostgreSQL 9.6devel. I can't > judge the diff > itself (it looks good but i'm not a PostgreSQL developper) but everything > works fine. > It would be a nice feature to have on OpenBSD.
Opinion poll: Should we commit this patch? -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
