On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 8:49 AM, Jesper Pedersen
<jesper.peder...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 04/07/2016 02:29 AM, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> So recovery is conflicting here. My guess is that this patch is
>> missing some lock cleanup.
>> With the test case attached in my case the COMMIT PREPARED record does
>> not even get replayed.
> Should we create an entry for the open item list [0] for this, due to the
> replication lag [1] ?
> CommitFest entry [2]
> Original commit [3]
> Cc'ed RMT.

If there is something you think needs to be fixed that is a new issue
in 9.6, then yes you should.  I don't quite understand what thing is
from reading this, so please make sure to describe it clearly.

Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to