Kevin Grittner <kgri...@gmail.com> writes: > On Sun, Apr 17, 2016 at 10:38 PM, Alvaro Herrera > <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >> I understand the backpatching pain argument, but my opinion was the >> contrary of yours even so.
> The other possibility would be to backpatch the no-op patch which > just uses the new syntax without any change in semantics. That would break 3rd-party extensions in a minor release, wouldn't it? Or do I misunderstand your suggestion? regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers