Kevin Grittner <> writes:
> On Sun, Apr 17, 2016 at 10:38 PM, Alvaro Herrera
> <> wrote:
>> I understand the backpatching pain argument, but my opinion was the
>> contrary of yours even so.

> The other possibility would be to backpatch the no-op patch which
> just uses the new syntax without any change in semantics.

That would break 3rd-party extensions in a minor release, wouldn't it?
Or do I misunderstand your suggestion?

                        regards, tom lane

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to