On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 3:14 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Or in short: this is a whole lot further than I'm prepared to go to
> satisfy one customer with a badly-designed application.  And from what
> I can tell from the Feb 2015 discussion, that's what this has been
> written for.

This holds true. I imagine that a lot of people at least on this list
have already spent some time in tracking down long-running
transactions in someone's application and actually tuned the
application so as the bloat gets reduced and things perform better for
other transactions taking a shorter time. Without the need of this

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to