On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 1:01 AM, Amit Langote <langote_amit...@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote: > ISTM, the sentence describes what happens in a *single instance* of > encountering duplicate (same name found in primary_conninfo of 2 or more > standbys). It's still one name but which of the standbys claims the spot > (for that name) of being a synchronous standby with given priority is > indeterminate. > > Now, there can be multiple instances of encountering duplicates, each for > a different sync slot. But this particular sentence seems to be talking > about what's the case for any given slot.
Right, that's my reading also. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
