On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 11:53 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 8:44 AM, Michael Paquier > <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 5:22 PM, Etsuro Fujita >> <fujita.ets...@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote: >>> Attached is an updated version of the patch, which modified Michael's >>> version of the patch, as I proposed in [1] (see "Other changes:"). I >>> modified comments for pgfdw_get_result/pgfdw_exec_query also, mainly because >>> words like "non-blocking mode" there seems confusing (note that we have >>> PQsetnonbloking). >> >> OK, so that is what I sent except that the comments mentioning PG_TRY >> are moved to their correct places. That's fine for me. Thanks for >> gathering everything in a single patch and correcting it. > > I have committed this patch. Thanks for working on this. Sorry for the > delay.
Thanks for the push. open_item--; -- Michael -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
