On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 9:57 AM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > For myself, I would rather have guc.c in the order that it's in. > Related options tend to be next to each other, and being able to look > up and down to see that they are all consistent has value for me.
+1 The GUC autovacuum_work_mem is beside other autovacuum GUCs, not other RESOURCES_MEM GUCs. track_activity_query_size is beside GUCs that relate to logging, and yet is also a RESOURCES_MEM GUC. So, neither of these GUCs would be better placed beside the things that we think of as RESOURCES_MEM GUCs, such as work_mem. In short, the existing ordering isn't really so arbitrary. -- Peter Geoghegan -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
