On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 1:37 AM, Michael Paquier <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> wrote: >> I haven't followed this issue all that closely, but to me it seems >> pretty clear. If the function is brand new to 9.6, buggy, and not even >> used anywhere, I cannot imagine why we would leave it in the tree. > > +1. We should definitely not encourage its use for 3rd-part plugins.
So, now there's clearly a consensus. Committed. :-) -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
