On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 1:37 AM, Michael Paquier
<michael.paqu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I haven't followed this issue all that closely, but to me it seems
>> pretty clear. If the function is brand new to 9.6, buggy, and not even
>> used anywhere, I cannot imagine why we would leave it in the tree.
>
> +1. We should definitely not encourage its use for 3rd-part plugins.

So, now there's clearly a consensus.  Committed.  :-)

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to