On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 02:54:35PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote: > On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 2:23 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: > >> I think it's about time for us to run pgindent. I did a trial run > >> today of pgindent today and came up with the attached patch for > >> typedefs.list, which I'd like to commit more or less immediately, > >> barring objections. > > > > Um, we normally take the buildfarm's list of typedefs, not anything > > manually created. > > Well, we can still do that, but I don't see much advantage in it. It > just churns the file to the extent that manual review of the changes > is impossible, and then when pgindent does the wrong thing it only > gets reported after the fact. How is that better than making sure > that the contents of the file are such as to actually produce good > output from pgindent?
Using the buildfarm typedefs assures they are always generated in a consistent way. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. + + Ancient Roman grave inscription + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
