On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 11:57 AM, Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote: > On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 11:51:42AM -0400, Robert Haas wrote: >> >> It mostly just adds new typedefs that have >> >> appeared over the last year, but it also realphabetizes the file - >> >> some things that were added incrementally seem to have ended up in >> >> what is, at least according to what sort likes to do on my machine, >> >> the wrong place in the file. >> > >> > Is it just me, or is the sort order in that file a bit confusing? The >> > whole thing about upper and lower case being separated seems to make it >> > much harder than necessary to manually insert something in the right >> > place.. >> >> Except for recently-manually-added entries, it seems to match what >> sort wants to do on my system exactly. Which seems good. > > Well, sort ordering is all related to your collation setting: > > $ echo "a > > A" | LC_COLLATE="" sort > a > A > > $ echo "a > A" | LC_COLLATE="en_US" sort > A > a
Sure. I guess we could resort that file with LC_COLLATE=C. But my point was mostly just that the ordering is hardly haphazard. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
