On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 5:15 PM, Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote: > On 2016-05-02 17:12:41 -0400, Robert Haas wrote: >> On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 5:09 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> > Alexander Korotkov <a.korot...@postgrespro.ru> writes: >> > But this is likely moot anyway, because of the need to bump all the >> > contrib modules' versions in order to install parallel-safety labels on >> > their functions. (I wonder why that isn't on the open-items list.) >> >> Because it was argued by Noah that this was 9.7 work. > > Thinking about this again, I think that's not a good approach: It'll > mean we've to do very similar testing in 9.7 again. I'd rather label as > much as possible in one release.
Yeah, I somewhat agree, but there's also no patch for this, yet. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers