On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 12:22 PM, Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote:
>> > but that might be fixed now.
>> Certainly all evidence suggests that, FUD to the contrary.
> So it's now FUD to report issues with a patch that obviously hasn't
> received sufficient benchmarking? Give me break.
Yeah, I don't think that's FUD. Kevin, since your last fix, we don't
have a round of benchmarking on a big machine to show whether that
fixed the issue or not. I think that to really know whether this is
fixed, somebody would need to compare current master with current
master after reverting snapshot too old on a big machine and see if
there's a difference. If anyone has done that, they have not posted
the results. So it's more accurate to say that we just don't know.
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org)
To make changes to your subscription: