On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 10:48 AM, David Rowley <david.row...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > On 5 May 2016 at 16:04, David Rowley <david.row...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >> I've started making some improvements to this, but need to talk to >> Tomas. It's currently in the middle of his night, but will try to >> catch him in his morning to discuss this with him. > > Ok, so I spoke to Tomas about this briefly, and he's asked me to send > in this patch. He didn't get time to look over it due to some other > commitments he has today. > > I do personally feel that if the attached is not good enough, or not > very close to good enough then probably the best course of action is > to revert the whole thing.
Tom, what do you think about this patch? Is it good enough, or should we revert the whole thing? -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers