* Dave Page (dp...@pgadmin.org) wrote:
> I imagine the bigger issue will be apps that have been written
> assuming the first part of the version number is only a single digit.

Let's just go with 2016 instead then.

At least then users would see how old the version they're running is (I
was just recently dealing with a 8.4 user...).



Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to