Stephen Frost <[email protected]> writes:
> On Friday, May 13, 2016, Bruce Momjian <[email protected]> wrote:
>> On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 12:05:34PM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
>>> Let's just go with 2016 instead then.
>> We tried, that, "Postgres95". ;-)
> Even better, we're being retro! It's in style! ;)
It would sure put a premium on not slipping releases past December.
If you don't rebrand, you look silly; if you do, you've lost the
ability to put out a new major release in the next year.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
