On 14/05/16 20:02, Petr Jelinek wrote:
+1 for going with 10.0 after 9.6 and 11.0 afterwards, etc.
It will hopefully both end these discussions and remove the confusion
the current versioning scheme has (I too heard way to many times about
people using postgres8 or postgres9).
Even worse: I've been told that a company was using "PostgreSQL
Álvaro Hernández Tortosa
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org)
To make changes to your subscription: