On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 9:42 AM, Joshua D. Drake <j...@commandprompt.com> wrote:
>> It's not a bad thought, but I do think it might be a bit confusing.
>> My main priority for this new option is that people aren't tempted to
>> use it very often, and I think a name like "even_frozen_pages" is more
>> likely to accomplish that than just "frozen".
>
> freeze_all_pages?

No, that's what the existing FREEZE option does.  This new option is
about unnecessarily vacuuming pages that don't need it.  The
expectation is that vacuuming all-frozen pages will be a no-op.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to