On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 9:42 AM, Joshua D. Drake <j...@commandprompt.com> wrote: >> It's not a bad thought, but I do think it might be a bit confusing. >> My main priority for this new option is that people aren't tempted to >> use it very often, and I think a name like "even_frozen_pages" is more >> likely to accomplish that than just "frozen". > > freeze_all_pages?
No, that's what the existing FREEZE option does. This new option is about unnecessarily vacuuming pages that don't need it. The expectation is that vacuuming all-frozen pages will be a no-op. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers