Thank you for the suggesion.  Currently no particular test cases are
in my mind. That's the reason why I need input from
community. Regarding the test schedule, PGECons starts the planning
from next month or so. So I guess test starts no earlier than July.

Best regards,
--
Tatsuo Ishii
SRA OSS, Inc. Japan
English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en.php
Japanese:http://www.sraoss.co.jp

> What kind of cases do you want to run? beside the multi-cores, i think the
> working mem and its access rate are also a main criteria. As you known the
> parallel query uses DSM as IPC tools, which means it will meet the memory
> access barrier.,the memory bus has its access rate limitation. the
> different system architecture, such as different CPU architect, etc,will
> also be considered when we do the performace test. Do we need to consider
> what i mentioned above?
> 
> Best Regards,
> 
> Hao LEE.
> 
> On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 11:07 PM, Tatsuo Ishii <is...@postgresql.org> wrote:
> 
>> Robert,
>> (and others who are involved in parallel query of PostgreSQL)
>>
>> PostgreSQL Enterprise Consortium (one of the PostgreSQL communities in
>> Japan, in short "PGECons") is planning to test the parallel query
>> performance of PostgreSQL 9.6. Besides TPC-H (I know you have already
>> tested on an IBM box), what kind of tests would you like be performed?
>>
>> We are planning to use a big intel box (like more than 60 cores).
>> Any suggestions are welcome.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> --
>> Tatsuo Ishii
>> SRA OSS, Inc. Japan
>> English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en.php
>> Japanese:http://www.sraoss.co.jp
>>
>>
>> --
>> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
>> To make changes to your subscription:
>> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
>>


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to