Thank you for the suggesion. Currently no particular test cases are in my mind. That's the reason why I need input from community. Regarding the test schedule, PGECons starts the planning from next month or so. So I guess test starts no earlier than July.
Best regards, -- Tatsuo Ishii SRA OSS, Inc. Japan English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en.php Japanese:http://www.sraoss.co.jp > What kind of cases do you want to run? beside the multi-cores, i think the > working mem and its access rate are also a main criteria. As you known the > parallel query uses DSM as IPC tools, which means it will meet the memory > access barrier.，the memory bus has its access rate limitation. the > different system architecture, such as different CPU architect, etc,will > also be considered when we do the performace test. Do we need to consider > what i mentioned above? > > Best Regards, > > Hao LEE. > > On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 11:07 PM, Tatsuo Ishii <is...@postgresql.org> wrote: > >> Robert, >> (and others who are involved in parallel query of PostgreSQL) >> >> PostgreSQL Enterprise Consortium (one of the PostgreSQL communities in >> Japan, in short "PGECons") is planning to test the parallel query >> performance of PostgreSQL 9.6. Besides TPC-H (I know you have already >> tested on an IBM box), what kind of tests would you like be performed? >> >> We are planning to use a big intel box (like more than 60 cores). >> Any suggestions are welcome. >> >> Best regards, >> -- >> Tatsuo Ishii >> SRA OSS, Inc. Japan >> English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en.php >> Japanese:http://www.sraoss.co.jp >> >> >> -- >> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) >> To make changes to your subscription: >> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers >> -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
