SRA OSS, Inc. Japan
> Maybe we can refere to the MPI test cases.
> On Sun, May 22, 2016 at 3:19 PM, Hao Lee <mixt...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> What kind of cases do you want to run? beside the multi-cores, i think the
>> working mem and its access rate are also a main criteria. As you known the
>> parallel query uses DSM as IPC tools, which means it will meet the memory
>> access barrier.，the memory bus has its access rate limitation. the
>> different system architecture, such as different CPU architect, etc,will
>> also be considered when we do the performace test. Do we need to consider
>> what i mentioned above?
>> Best Regards,
>> Hao LEE.
>> On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 11:07 PM, Tatsuo Ishii <is...@postgresql.org>
>>> (and others who are involved in parallel query of PostgreSQL)
>>> PostgreSQL Enterprise Consortium (one of the PostgreSQL communities in
>>> Japan, in short "PGECons") is planning to test the parallel query
>>> performance of PostgreSQL 9.6. Besides TPC-H (I know you have already
>>> tested on an IBM box), what kind of tests would you like be performed?
>>> We are planning to use a big intel box (like more than 60 cores).
>>> Any suggestions are welcome.
>>> Best regards,
>>> Tatsuo Ishii
>>> SRA OSS, Inc. Japan
>>> English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en.php
>>> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com)
>>> To make changes to your subscription:
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org)
To make changes to your subscription: