Andreas Karlsson <andr...@proxel.se> writes: > It is the least ugly of all the ugly solutions I could think of. I have > attached a patch which fixes the signatures using this method. I use > CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION to update to catcache. What do you think? Is > it too ugly?
I don't understand why you think you need the CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION commands? We only need to change proargtypes, and the updates did that. The catcache can take care of itself. I think it would be good practice to be more careful about schema-qualifying all the pg_catalog table and type names. I also think it's a bad idea to use to_regprocedure() rather than a cast to regprocedure. If the name isn't found, we want an error, not a silent NULL result leading to no update occurring. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers