On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 09:29:54PM -0400, Noah Misch wrote: > On Sun, May 29, 2016 at 01:36:01AM -0400, Noah Misch wrote: > > On Fri, May 06, 2016 at 03:06:01PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote: > > > On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 10:48 AM, David Rowley > > > <david.row...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > > > > On 5 May 2016 at 16:04, David Rowley <david.row...@2ndquadrant.com> > > > > wrote: > > > >> I've started making some improvements to this, but need to talk to > > > >> Tomas. It's currently in the middle of his night, but will try to > > > >> catch him in his morning to discuss this with him. > > > > > > > > Ok, so I spoke to Tomas about this briefly, and he's asked me to send > > > > in this patch. He didn't get time to look over it due to some other > > > > commitments he has today. > > > > > > > > I do personally feel that if the attached is not good enough, or not > > > > very close to good enough then probably the best course of action is > > > > to revert the whole thing. > > > > > > Tom, what do you think about this patch? Is it good enough, or should > > > we revert the whole thing? > > > > [This is a generic notification.] > > > > The above-described topic is currently a PostgreSQL 9.6 open item. Simon, > > since you committed the patch believed to have created it, you own this open > > item. If some other commit is more relevant or if this does not belong as a > > 9.6 open item, please let us know. Otherwise, please observe the policy on > > open item ownership[1] and send a status update within 72 hours of this > > message. Include a date for your subsequent status update. Testers may > > discover new open items at any time, and I want to plan to get them all > > fixed > > well in advance of shipping 9.6rc1. Consequently, I will appreciate your > > efforts toward speedy resolution. Thanks. > > > > [1] > > http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20160527025039.ga447...@tornado.leadboat.com > > This PostgreSQL 9.6 open item is past due for your status update. Kindly send > a status update within 24 hours, and include a date for your subsequent status > update. Refer to the policy on open item ownership: > http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20160527025039.ga447...@tornado.leadboat.com
IMMEDIATE ATTENTION REQUIRED. This PostgreSQL 9.6 open item is long past due for your status update. Please reacquaint yourself with the policy on open item ownership[1] and then reply immediately. If I do not hear from you by 2016-06-04 15:00 UTC, I will transfer this item to release management team ownership without further notice. [1] http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20160527025039.ga447...@tornado.leadboat.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
