On 3 May 2016 at 16:10, Tomas Vondra <tomas.von...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:

> While this in itself is about a two-line fix, after reviewing
>> 137805f89acb3611 I'm pretty unhappy that it got committed at all.
>> I think this obvious bug is a good sign that it wasn't ready.
>> Other unfinished aspects like invention of an undocumented GUC
>> don't leave a good impression either.
> The GUC is meant to make testing during development easier. I haven't
> realized it got committed, but I assume Simon plans to remove it before the
> final release.

Yes, the GUC was for testing, as mentioned on the commit message.

> Can't check right now with Simon, though, as he's is out of office this
> week.

Am back and reading.

Simon Riggs                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

Reply via email to