On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 5:02 PM, Tom Lane <[email protected]> wrote: > Markus Wanner <[email protected]> writes: >> That leaves me wondering if it's really worth extending INET, though. >> TEXT would be just fine to store a textual scope id. And it makes it >> utterly clear that there's no magic involved. > > True, but it would force users to disassemble and reassemble the > "address%scope" notation, which is kind of a pain.
Yeah, but what if somebody doesn't want to store scopes? ff::1%fourscoreandsevenyearsagoourforefathersbroughtforthonthiscontinentanewnationconceivedinlibertyanddedicatedtothepropositionthatlallmenarecreatedequal -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
