On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 12:23 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> "David G. Johnston" <david.g.johns...@gmail.com> writes: > > On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 1:35 AM, Michael Paquier < > michael.paqu...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > >> I have finally given a shot at improving the docs with the attached. > >> Comments are welcome. > > > [ assorted comments ] > > I adopted most of David's suggestions, whacked it around a bit further > myself, and committed. See what you think. > Looks good though I'm waiting for the website to update. Do I understand the process correctly? The current 9.6 docs reflect what was committed and branched as beta1. Ongoing work is done against master (devel docs). When beta2 is released it is branched from the current master; not beta1. At that point the current devel docs will become the new 9.6 docs. Thanks! David J.
