Robert Haas <> writes:
> So I really would like to get a pgindent run done.  Any objections to
> doing it sometime RSN?  It is of course possible that it might make
> something that we want to revert later harder to revert, but I think
> we should just accept that risk and move forward.

Now that we bit the bullet on 137805f89, I do not think there's anything
else with a really high probability of being reverted.  Might as well do
the run.  Please note that typedefs.list is already out of date.

                        regards, tom lane

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to