On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 11:31 AM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 11:23 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: >>> OK, I committed this. Barring objections, I'll go ahead and pgindent >>> the whole tree tomorrow. If we're going to revert anything big then >>> we might want to hold off, but otherwise I think its better to get >>> this done sooner rather than later. >> >> Well, there are at least two patchsets we're actively discussing >> reverting, so I think this should wait till those decisions are resolved. > > OK, but that may well mean we don't get this done before beta1, which > I think is a bummer, but oh well.
So I really would like to get a pgindent run done. Any objections to doing it sometime RSN? It is of course possible that it might make something that we want to revert later harder to revert, but I think we should just accept that risk and move forward. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
