On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 6:09 PM, Peter Geoghegan <p...@heroku.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 1:08 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> I am in favor of having something similar to
>>> max_parallel_workers_per_gather for utility statements like CREATE
>>> INDEX. That will need a cost model, at least where the DBA isn't
>>> explicit about the number of workers to use.
>> We may well need that, but I think it should be discussed in
>> conjunction with the patches that add parallelism for those utility
>> statements, rather than discussing it on a thread for a 9.6 open item.
> Of course.
> I don't think it needs to be scoped to utility statements. It's just
> clear that it's not appropriate to use max_parallel_workers_per_gather
> within utility statements, even though something like that will be
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org)
To make changes to your subscription: