I wrote: > Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: >> There's one other related thing I'm concerned about, which is that the >> code in namespace.c that manages pg_temp doesn't know anything about >> parallelism. So it will interpret pg_temp to mean the pg_temp_NNN >> schema for its own backend ID rather than the leader's backend ID. >> I'm not sure that's a problem, but I haven't thought deeply about it.
> Hmmm. I'll take a look. Yeah, that was pretty broken, but I believe I've fixed it. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers