Amit Kapila writes:

> Right, so I have moved "Failed assertion in parallel worker
> (ExecInitSubPlan)" item to CLOSE_WAIT state as I don't think there is any
> known pending issue in that item.  I have moved it to CLOSE_WAIT state
> because we have derived our queries to reproduce the problem based on
> original report[1].  If next run of sqlsmith doesn't show any problem in
> this context then we will move it to resolved.

It ran for about 100e6 queries by now without tripping on any parallel
worker related assertions.  I tested with min_parallel_relation_size_v1.patch
applied and set to 64kB to have more exposure during testing.


Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to