Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 10:39 PM, Noah Misch <n...@leadboat.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 04:46:19PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> The above-described topic is currently a PostgreSQL 9.6 open item ("fix
>> possible confusion between subqueries and subplans").
Advertising
> This open item comes with a patch submitted by Tom Lane. If Tom wants
> me to review and (if no problems are found) commit that patch to
> resolve this open item, I'm willing to do that. But generally I don't
> commit patches submitted by other committers unless that person and I
> have agreed on it in advance, which is not currently the case here.
> Tom, do you want to commit this, or do you want me to handle it, or
> something else?
I was not sure if you'd agreed that the patch was correct, and in any
case I thought you wanted to fold it into the upperrel consider_parallel
patch. I feel no great need to commit it myself, if that's what you
meant.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
