On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 1:42 AM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 4:03 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes:
>>> On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 10:39 PM, Noah Misch <n...@leadboat.com> wrote:
>>>> On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 04:46:19PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>>>> The above-described topic is currently a PostgreSQL 9.6 open item ("fix
>>>> possible confusion between subqueries and subplans").
>>> This open item comes with a patch submitted by Tom Lane.  If Tom wants
>>> me to review and (if no problems are found) commit that patch to
>>> resolve this open item, I'm willing to do that.  But generally I don't
>>> commit patches submitted by other committers unless that person and I
>>> have agreed on it in advance, which is not currently the case here.
>>> Tom, do you want to commit this, or do you want me to handle it, or
>>> something else?
>> I was not sure if you'd agreed that the patch was correct, and in any
>> case I thought you wanted to fold it into the upperrel consider_parallel
>> patch.  I feel no great need to commit it myself, if that's what you
>> meant.
> OK, I'll set aside some time for further review and either commit it
> or send an update by COB Thursday US time.

I had couple of questions [1] related to that patch.  See if you find
those as relevant?

[1] - 

With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to