On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 4:43 AM, Stephen Frost <sfr...@snowman.net> wrote: > All, > > * Alvaro Herrera (alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com) wrote: >> Michael Paquier wrote: >> > On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 7:34 PM, Fujii Masao <masao.fu...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > > I have one question; why do we call the column "conn_info" instead of >> > > "conninfo" which is basically used in other places? "conninfo" is better >> > > to me. >> > >> > No real reason for one or the other to be honest. If you want to >> > change it you could just apply the attached. >> >> I was of two minds myself, and found no reason to change conn_info, so I >> decided to keep what was submitted. If you want to change it, I'm not >> opposed. >> >> Don't forget to bump catversion. > > 'conninfo' certainly seems to be more commonly used and I believe is > what was agreed to up-thread.
+1. So since no one objects to change the column name, I applied Michael's patch. Thanks! Regards, -- Fujii Masao -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers