On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 4:43 AM, Stephen Frost <sfr...@snowman.net> wrote:
> All,
> * Alvaro Herrera (alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com) wrote:
>> Michael Paquier wrote:
>> > On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 7:34 PM, Fujii Masao <masao.fu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > > I have one question; why do we call the column "conn_info" instead of
>> > > "conninfo" which is basically used in other places? "conninfo" is better 
>> > > to me.
>> >
>> > No real reason for one or the other to be honest. If you want to
>> > change it you could just apply the attached.
>> I was of two minds myself, and found no reason to change conn_info, so I
>> decided to keep what was submitted.  If you want to change it, I'm not
>> opposed.
>> Don't forget to bump catversion.
> 'conninfo' certainly seems to be more commonly used and I believe is
> what was agreed to up-thread.

+1. So since no one objects to change the column name,
I applied Michael's patch. Thanks!


Fujii Masao

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to