Michael Paquier wrote: > On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 8:50 AM, Michael Paquier > <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Okay, that argument I buy. > >> > >> I suppose this function/view should report no row at all if there is no > >> wal receiver connected, rather than a view with nulls. > > > > The function returns PG_RETURN_NULL() so as we don't have to use a > > SRF, and the view checks for IS NOT NULL, so there would be no rows > > popping up. > > In short, I would just go with the attached and call it a day. Done, thanks. -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
