On 8 July 2016 at 00:48, Joshua D. Drake <j...@commandprompt.com> wrote:

> On 07/07/2016 01:10 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
>> On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 8:52 PM, David Fetter <da...@fetter.org> wrote:
>>> In light of the above, it is perfectly reasonable to require, at least
>>> temporarily, setting up duplicate storage, or another node.
> pg_upgrade does that, kinda.  I'd like to have something better, but
>> in the absence of that, I think it's quite wrong to think about
>> deprecating it, even if we had logical replication fully integrated
>> into core today.  Which we by no means do.
> I would much rather see more brain power put into pg_upgrade or in place
> upgrades than logical replication (as a upgrade solution).

Why is that?

Simon Riggs                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

Reply via email to