On Sat, Jul 09, 2016 at 12:55:33AM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote: > * Noah Misch (n...@leadboat.com) wrote: > > This PostgreSQL 9.6 open item is past due for your status update. Kindly > > send > > a status update within 24 hours, and include a date for your subsequent > > status > > update. Refer to the policy on open item ownership: > > http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20160527025039.ga447...@tornado.leadboat.com > > Unfortunately, not going to make any further progress on this tonight or > over the weekend as I'm going to be out of town. I believe I've > convinced myself that adding a template1 entry to pg_init_privs will be > both sufficient and produce the correct results, along with adjusting > the query in pg_dumpall to join through it. Will provide an update on > Monday.
This PostgreSQL 9.6 open item is long past due for your status update. Kindly send a status update within 24 hours, and include a date for your subsequent status update. (Your Tuesday posting lacked a date.) -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers