On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 03:46:17PM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote: > * Noah Misch (n...@leadboat.com) wrote: > > On Sat, Jul 09, 2016 at 12:55:33AM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote: > > > * Noah Misch (n...@leadboat.com) wrote: > > > > This PostgreSQL 9.6 open item is past due for your status update. > > > > Kindly send > > > > a status update within 24 hours, and include a date for your subsequent > > > > status > > > > update. Refer to the policy on open item ownership: > > > > http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20160527025039.ga447...@tornado.leadboat.com > > > > > > Unfortunately, not going to make any further progress on this tonight or > > > over the weekend as I'm going to be out of town. I believe I've > > > convinced myself that adding a template1 entry to pg_init_privs will be > > > both sufficient and produce the correct results, along with adjusting > > > the query in pg_dumpall to join through it. Will provide an update on > > > Monday. > > > > This PostgreSQL 9.6 open item is long past due for your status update. > > Kindly > > send a status update within 24 hours, and include a date for your subsequent > > status update. (Your Tuesday posting lacked a date.) > > Yeah, I realized that tablespaces have the same issue and have updated > the patch to address them as well, in the same way. > > Going through and doing testing now. Unfortunately, it doesn't look > like adding in testing of tablespaces into the TAP tests would be very > easy (the only TAP test that deals with tablespaces that I found was > pg_basebackup and that looks rather grotty..), so I'm not planning to do > that, at least not at this time. > > As such, I'm planning to commit the patch with the fix+regression test > for database ACLs and the fix for tablespace ACLs either later today > or tomorrow.
Does commit 47f5bb9 fully fix this open item? -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers