Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > Although this is in principle a bug fix, it's invasive enough that I'd
> > be pretty hesitant to back-patch it, or even to stick it into HEAD
> > post-beta.  I'm inclined to sign it up for the next commitfest instead.
> Do we have a backpatchable fix for the reported problem?  If so, then it
> seems a good tradeoff to install this more invasive fix in HEAD only and
> apply the simpler fix to back branches.  Otherwise, is the proposal to
> leave the bug unfixed in back branches?

I meant "install in HEAD only, after the 10.0 branch", which is what you

Álvaro Herrera      
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to