On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 5:37 PM, Fujii Masao <masao.fu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Maybe I failed to parse his proposal. It's helpful if you elaborate it.

As per mail [1], it seems the proposal is not to use .tar for -Z 0.
Now here actually we are on the fence, one can argue that if user
doesn't want compression, he or she can use -F p (plain format).
OTOH, without compression getting the backup as a single .tar file
makes it simple to manage.  I think there is some value in providing
.tar for -Z 0, however in that case how should we define usage of -F p
-Z 0?  Shall we say with plain format -Z 0 gets ignored or throw error
or do something else?  If first, then I think it is better to mention
the same in docs.

[1] - 
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to