On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 11:01 PM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 7:34 PM, Fujii Masao <masao.fu...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 10:16 PM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> I think there is some value in providing >>> .tar for -Z 0, >> >> I was thinking that "-Ft -Z0" is something like an alias of "-Ft". >> That is, the backup is taken in uncompressed tar format. >> >>> however in that case how should we define usage of -F p >>> -Z 0? Shall we say with plain format -Z 0 gets ignored or throw error >>> or do something else? If first, then I think it is better to mention >>> the same in docs. >> >> ISTM that it's better to ignore that case, like pg_dump -Ft -Z0 >> doesn't throw an error. >> > > Okay, then you can go ahead with your patch.
Thanks for the comment! I pushed the patch. Regards, -- Fujii Masao -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers