On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 11:01 PM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 7:34 PM, Fujii Masao <masao.fu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 10:16 PM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> 
>> wrote:
>>> I think there is some value in providing
>>> .tar for -Z 0,
>> I was thinking that "-Ft -Z0" is something like an alias of "-Ft".
>> That is, the backup is taken in uncompressed tar format.
>>> however in that case how should we define usage of -F p
>>> -Z 0?  Shall we say with plain format -Z 0 gets ignored or throw error
>>> or do something else?  If first, then I think it is better to mention
>>> the same in docs.
>> ISTM that it's better to ignore that case, like pg_dump -Ft -Z0
>> doesn't throw an error.
> Okay, then you can go ahead with your patch.

Thanks for the comment! I pushed the patch.


Fujii Masao

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to